
Service guide
Same race, one year on: how to tell whether you have really improved
Going back to a race you already know is the most honest test of your progress. But one time against another never tells the whole story: the course, the weather and your start wave run that race with you.
In 30 seconds
- Why it works
- Same place, same time of year, same kind of course: the fairest benchmark
- What can change
- Course layout, obstacles or zones, weather, ground and start wave
- What to look at
- Your splits, not just the finish time
- How to read it
- As a trend over several years, not a test to the second
- In Club Pulse
- Your result next to other editions of the same race
Why the same race is your best yardstick
Putting a mountain race next to a city race tells you very little: the real distance, the climbing, the surface and even the start time are all different. When you repeat the same event, most of that stays put, and the thing that moves is you.
That is why plenty of athletes pick one or two “benchmark” races and return every year. It does not have to be the biggest date on your calendar; it just has to be one you can come back to fairly regularly.
What can change from one edition to the next
Same name and same start line do not guarantee the exact same race. Before drawing conclusions, go over what changed around your result.
- The course: obstacle race layouts are adjusted often, and a few hundred metres or one extra climb is enough to move the clock.
- Obstacles or zones: a new obstacle, a removed one or a different order changes how the effort is spread.
- Weather and ground: heat, wind, rain or mud can weigh more than weeks of training.
- Your start wave: a busier wave can mean queues at obstacles that have nothing to do with your fitness.
- Your own context: a recent injury, poor sleep or a long trip the day before all count too.
Compare splits, not just the finish time
The finish time squeezes everything into one number. If the race publishes splits, line them up section by section: you will see whether you gained on the running, on the obstacles or on the final stretch, and whether you lost time at one specific point.
Improving in one section and slipping in another is common. That is exactly the useful part: it tells you which training is working and which is not, something the total time hides.
If a section changed route between years, leave it out of the comparison and stick to the ones that stayed the same.
Reading your progress honestly
A faster year does not always mean you are fitter, and a slower year does not always mean you are worse. Before celebrating or getting frustrated, ask how much of the gap is yours and how much belongs to the race.
Your relative position is a good reference: if everyone slowed down in the heat and you lost less than most, you improved even if the clock says otherwise. And once you have three or more editions, the trend matters more than any single year.
Setting a realistic target for the next edition
Start from your splits, not a round number. Pick the section where you lost the most time and set a concrete goal for it; that is easier to train for and to measure than “break time X”.
Fit the goal to what you can actually train before the next edition, and accept that race day may bring different conditions. A good target is demanding but reachable, and still leaves room to enjoy the race.
- A section goal: for example, reaching the last third with enough left to hold your pace.
- An execution goal: clearing the obstacles you failed last time without a penalty.
- A result goal: a time improvement that matches what your splits show.
Your editions in one place
In the Pulse app, Club Pulse shows your result and, when the race publishes them, your splits. You can also see your result next to other editions of the same race, so you do not have to rely on screenshots or memory.
Having it all together makes the important part easier: sitting down for a few minutes after each race, checking what changed and deciding what to train before the next one.
Frequently asked questions
Is it worth comparing my time if the course changed?
Yes, with care. Use it as a rough guide and focus on the sections that stayed the same. If the change was big, the total time comparison loses value and your relative position becomes the better reference.
How many editions do I need to see a trend?
Two give you a first comparison, but a single difference can come down to the weather or the course. From three editions on, the trend becomes far more reliable.
What if I was slower than last year?
Before drawing conclusions, check what changed: course, weather, start wave and how you arrived on the day. Look at your splits too; you may have improved in some sections even if the total is worse.
Can I compare different races of the same format?
It depends on the format. DEKA zones are the same worldwide, so the comparison makes sense. Every Spartan course is different, so it is better to compare editions of the same race.
Where do I see the comparison between editions?
In the Pulse app, inside Club Pulse, next to your result and your splits when the race publishes them.
Keep reading
Club PulseHow to read your race splits, why comparing editions of the same race shows real progress, and where to find your results and the DEKA leaderboard in Pulse.Read →
Reading your resultsGun time or chip time, overall and age-group positions, splits and pacing: learn to read your race results and turn them into a plan for your next race.Read →
Season goalsPick one main race, place a few secondary ones, leave room to recover and use your past results to set realistic goals for your next racing season.Read →
Next year’s race starts with this year’s numbers
Check what changed, keep what depends on you and pick a goal you can train for. Next year you will have one more benchmark.

